Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / New defense budget is more of the same
Grand strategy

May 28, 2021

New defense budget is more of the same

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 28, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden is submitting his 2022 budget request to Congress, which includes a national security budget of $753 billion. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden administration’s request for $753 billion in national security spending is more of the same. It represents a continuation of the old military strategy of seeking global military dominance at a growing cost that has been bleeding the country with excessive spending and failing wars for decades. Contrary to its advertising, this budget does not refocus spending to meet an overhyped Chinese threat in Asia. That would involve shifting forces and funds away from ground forces, interminable occupations in the Middle East, and plans to fight big ground wars for rich allies. It doesn’t choose much at all, keeping funds flowing at a roughly constant rate, plus inflation, to the services and their present missions.

“A budget that accepted military spending cannot win endless small wars or prop up U.S. hegemony indefinitely would choose more and spend far less. By accepting that U.S. forces should help allies sustain a stable balance of power rather than overwhelm all potential adversaries in every theater it would enable focus. A more restrained strategy would save by focusing on commanding the global commons and maintaining long-range strike capability with air and sea forces. It would cut ground forces, administrative support, and personnel costs. By limiting conflict and risk, that strategy would enhance security at lower cost and aid the internal improvements that are the ultimate source of U.S. strength.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edGrand strategy

DOGE Has Its Sights on the Defense Department

By Gil Barndollar

May 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Big, Bloated Defense Budget

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances

Geography has given the US unrivaled security. Trump is destroying it

By Gil Barndollar and Rajan Menon

May 4, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Israel‑Hamas

The frenetic foreign policy of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days

By Daniel DePetris

April 29, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump is learning America isn’t as powerful as he thought

By Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, Drones

Trump’s idea to use drones strikes in Mexico could make cartel violence worse

By Daniel DePetris

April 10, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved