Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Intra-Afghan negotiations are good news—but withdrawal remains the priority
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

December 2, 2020

Intra-Afghan negotiations are good news—but withdrawal remains the priority

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 2, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, representatives from the Afghan government and the Taliban agreed to a preliminary deal to proceed with peace talks. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Afghan government’s framework agreement with the Taliban to proceed with talks is good news for Afghanistan. The prospect of an actual peace deal remains distant, but this is a step in that direction. It is also good news because it should lessen political opposition to the United States withdrawing its forces by the May deadline as agreed to in the U.S. deal with the Taliban. That withdrawal is long overdue and in the U.S. interest.

“The United States should applaud this deal and continue to support talks diplomatically. U.S. troops, however, should not be kept in Afghanistan to somehow buttress peace talks. That is a recipe for missing the May deadline and resumed U.S.-Taliban combat. And given the still long odds of a stable peace deal, it’s a way to stay in Afghanistan for another decade or more.

“The U.S. interest in Afghanistan is to prevent international terrorism. That can be accomplished without ground troops, through long-range strikes, local partners, and the threat of renewed strikes against the Taliban if they fail to hold up their end of the deal. Continuing a failed nation-building campaign is a mistake.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Israel‑Iran

Why China’s sitting on the Iran war sidelines

By Lyle Goldstein

June 25, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved