Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Global posture / Global Posture Review whiffs (in secret)
Global posture, China

November 29, 2021

Global Posture Review whiffs (in secret)

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 29, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Pentagon announced the completion of its Global Posture Review, which was meant to assess the U.S. military footprint worldwide. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Global Posture Review arrived at last today, sort of, with a whimper. The Pentagon declared the review complete, but classified, and issued a short press release heralding its achievements, which appear to be none. The review, anonymous officials tell us, basically decided that the basing status quo is good. The Pentagon effectively patted itself on the shoulder in secret and told taxpayers ‘trust us; all is well.’ It isn’t.

“U.S. force posture is a servant of a wasteful strategy that sees U.S. garrisons as magical solutions to problems they don’t solve, and that U.S. foreign policy could safely ignore in most cases. We could be secure with far fewer bases in the Middle East, Europe, and even Asia. More U.S. forces and basing near China are not going to slow Beijing’s rise as a great power and are unnecessary to defend major allies there, who are rich and defensible. Even without changing strategy, the review might have recommended reductions in basing on the grounds that long-range precision weapons have made overseas bases both more vulnerable and less necessary to strike enemies. No such luck.

“It could have been worse. Pentagon review documents typically gush strategic-sounding piffle, exhausting readers with laborious defenses of the status quo. This one at least spared us that.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

Events on Global posture

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Refusing to choose: did the global posture review fail?

December 10, 2021

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved