Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / US-Israel-Iran / End the Iran war, with or without a deal
US‑Israel‑Iran, Basing and global posture, Iran, Middle East, Military analysis

November 12, 2026

End the Iran war, with or without a deal

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 12, 2026
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Donald Trump said that “we don’t need a deal with Iran,” putting a halt to diplomatic efforts led by Vice President JD Vance. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“President Trump is right that we don’t need a deal with Iran, but that should be an opening to end the war, not continue with the current failing approach to it. Vance’s defenestration from Trump’s foreign policy team seems to reflect the president’s deeper embrace of a war that voters just rejected.

“Americans’ political judgement about the war reflects strategic reality: the war is failing, and time isn’t on our side. Iran is suffering more than the United States, but they have far greater will to suffer because they are under attack. While more oil is flowing through the strait, the threat of Iran’s attacks keeps its volume down and prices up, which juices inflation. Iran’s economic plight, meanwhile, seems unlikely to produce political change. By attacking Iran and killing many of its leaders, the United States and Israel made its government more hardline while increasing popular support for its inflexible stances. Iran’s leaders would be hard-pressed to accept even quite favorable deals. And attacking Iran makes it more likely hardliners overcome the lingering resistance to building nuclear weapons.

“An agreement to end the war and address additional sources of tension between the United States and Iran would be useful, but it isn’t necessary. All the United States really needs from Iran is to let shipping flow through the strait. That would bring down oil prices. The United States should stop blockading Iran and pull its naval forces back. Iran will likely then let shipping flow, albeit with a toll, ending the problem that this misbegotten war created.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on US-Israel-Iran

Op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Ukraine‑Russia, US‑Israel‑Iran

What a The Incoming Congress means for Iran, Israel and Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

November 10, 2026

Op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Ukraine‑Russia, US‑Israel‑Iran

Don’t let Taiwan’s silicon shield become a U.S. silicon trap

By Lyle Goldstein

November 10, 2026

Op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

What the Israeli Elections Mean for U.S. National Security

By William Walldorf

November 5, 2026

In the mediaMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

After midterm loss, Trump is left to weigh his next move in Iran war

Featuring Brian Haggerty

November 5, 2026

Op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Could the new Congress bring an end to the Iran war?

By Daniel DePetris

November 4, 2026

Op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

The next Congress shouldn’t let Iran become a ‘background war’

By Andrew Jarocki

November 4, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by donations from individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.