Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Baghdad airstrike adds to risks U.S. troops face in Iraq and Syria
Middle East, Air power, Iraq, Syria

January 4, 2024

Baghdad airstrike adds to risks U.S. troops face in Iraq and Syria

By Michael DiMino

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 4, 2024
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the U.S. carried out a strike which killed an Iran-linked militia commander in Iraq. Defense Priorities Public Policy Manager and Fellow Michael DiMino issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden Administration’s decision to kill a senior Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) commander in a Baghdad airstrike was ostensibly undertaken to protect U.S. troops from ongoing attacks by Shia militia groups, but it will achieve exactly the opposite.

“In response, the PMF will no doubt redouble their efforts to kill American troops, who have been attacked more than 100 times since October 7th. Our men and women serving in Iraq are now in severe danger for a mission that should have ended years ago, in a country that no longer wants them there.

“Like it or not, over the past decade the PMF has successfully captured the Iraqi government. Iraqi political leaders can only hold office with de facto PMF approval. Sadly, PMF leadership and Iraqi leadership are now essentially the same. So killing PMF leaders may be a tactical success in response to attacks on U.S. troops, but it makes little strategic sense. It will only drive a threadbare but more radical Iraqi government further into Iran’s arms, lead to a purge of the few remaining pro-U.S. holdouts in Iraqi politics, and put America on a trajectory towards open warfare with a PMF-dominated Iraq, which could then ignite a regional war.

“This airstrike also underscores the schizophrenic and unsustainable nature of U.S. foreign policy in Iraq. We provide billions in aid to the Iraqi government, much of which is funneled to Iran in the form of energy payments and then used to fund the PMF, while we conduct airstrikes on their senior paramilitary commanders for attacking our troops. It’s maddening.

“We must stop this vicious cycle. Instead, we should acknowledge that our troops in Iraq and Syria now functionally exist to be attacked by Shia militia groups. They have been on lockdown for months. They aren’t fighting terrorists or deterring Iran. They are sitting ducks. This is not a mission worthy of our service members. The Israel-Hamas War has proven these bases are a strategic liability that provide leverage to Iranian hardliners that want nothing more than to drag the U.S. into a proxy war. Moreover, U.S. national interests in Syria and Iraq are minimal to nonexistent. Any residual counterterrorism efforts there are better achieved with over-the-horizon capabilities and burden-sharing with local actors than a permanent presence.”

Author

Photo of Michael DiMino

Michael
DiMino

Former Public Policy Manager & Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

A U.S. Attack on Iran Is Still the Worst Option

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 26, 2026

In the mediaIran, Middle East

Donald Trump Speech Missed Some Marks: Newsweek Writers’ SOTU Verdicts

Featuring Daniel DePetris

February 25, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

Trump’s Syria withdrawal makes good strategic sense

By Alexander Langlois

February 25, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

U.S. Iran Strike Would Be ‘Attempt’ at Regime Change

Featuring Daniel Davis

February 23, 2026

In the mediaIran, Diplomacy, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

‘Crisis of his own making’: Donald Trump weighs another war with Iran

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

February 23, 2026

ExplainerUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Middle East

Why Iran talks should deal only with nuclear issues

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 23, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved