Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Will there be another Israel-Hezbollah war?
Middle East, Grand strategy, Israel

January 19, 2024

Will there be another Israel-Hezbollah war?

By Daniel DePetris

The most important diplomatic initiative in the Middle East isn’t the one taking place in Gaza, where the Israeli military shows no inclination to stop its military offensive against Hamas. It’s the discreet back-channel talks being led by Amos Hochstein, who is fast emerging as one of President Joe Biden’s most trusted troubleshooters. His task: negotiate a deescalation between Israel and Hezbollah along the Israel-Lebanon border area, prevent a wider conflict from erupting, and if all else holds, get all the parties around the table to strike a permanent border deal.

The last item on that list is a tall order, no matter how skilled the negotiator. And quite frankly, it’s probably not worth wasting too much time on right now because the odds of success are so low. Getting the Israelis and Hezbollah to stop shooting at each other, however, is doable, and it’s where Hochstein should invest all of his efforts.

Ever since Israel and Hezbollah signed a ceasefire agreement in the summer of 2006, the two sides have largely operated on an unwritten understanding: While we’re enemies, we agree to defer another conflict as far into the future as possible. It doesn’t take a genius to understand why: The last war between Israeli and Hezbollah forces, while relatively short, was extremely devastating to both Israel and Lebanon. About 1,200 Lebanese people were killed, southern Beirut was reduced to rubble, Israeli troop casualties were high compared to previous military engagements over the last decade, and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s government couldn’t achieve its initial, maximalist goals. While United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 wasn’t implemented in full by either Israel or Hezbollah, the parties nevertheless stuck to its most critical component: a cessation of hostilities.

No longer. Israeli and Hezbollah forces have been exchanging fire for more than three months now. There have been casualties on both sides of the U.N.-demarcated Blue Line. Entire villages and towns in northern Israel and southern Lebanon have been emptied, and more than 150,000 people in the border areas have fled to safer ground. For Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his uber-right-wing coalition government, having tens of thousands of Israelis permanently displaced from their homes is simply not a sustainable situation and would be yet another political drag on a government that has lost the support of most of the country.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What Israel’s Qatar strike on Hamas reveals

By Daniel DePetris

September 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What does Trump want in Gaza?

By Daniel DePetris

September 4, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Sanctions

Why European countries want to reimpose harsh sanctions on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Syria

Donald Trump tries to make history in Syria and Lebanon

By Daniel DePetris

August 26, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved