Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Trump can transform Middle East policy
Middle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

February 7, 2025

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

President Donald Trump has entered the White House with an ambitious international agenda. Whether it’s expanding the 2020 Abraham Accords between Israel and the Arab world, ending the three-year-long war in Ukraine or pushing Europe to spend more on its own defense, Trump isn’t wasting any time outlining his expectations.

Some of them, like taking over Gaza and turning the territory into a U.S.-administered haven for the “world’s people,” are downright bonkers. Others, like higher European defense budgets, are far more conventional and increasingly recognized as urgent and necessary. All of these items, however, are small ball compared to what has the potential to be a crowning accomplishment for the Trump administration: a total and complete reform of U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Despite Trump’s reputation for unpredictability, his rhetoric on this region has been consistent since his first run for the White House nearly a decade ago. Then as now, Trump blasts U.S. regime change wars over the last two decades as a calamitous waste of U.S. resources, blames past presidents for foolishly sending the U.S. military on missions it shouldn’t have been asked to fight and laments the life-altering damage those wars inflicted on U.S. servicemembers.

After decades of foreign wars, many Americans share the president’s perspective. The conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya either lasted too long, destabilized the Middle East or created a host of additional security problems that the U.S. proved incapable of managing. Military operations in Iraq and Syria cost U.S. taxpayers nearly $3 trillion between 2003 and 2023, a period when U.S. deficits grew at a fast clip. In Afghanistan, U.S. troops were mired in a civil war against a resilient Taliban insurgency on behalf of a government in Kabul more skilled at corruption than governing. None of this made the United States safer or stronger—if anything, Washington’s adversaries were content with watching the Americans shoot themselves in the foot by plunging into never-ending black holes.

Read at The American Conservative

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East

Provoking a war with Iran could be a deadly miscalculation for Trump

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2026

Press ReleaseSyria, Middle East

Drawdown from Syria a success worth scaling

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2026

op-edU.S.‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s maximalism could derail Iran negotiations

By Daniel DePetris

February 12, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved