Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / The case for diplomacy with Iran
Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

December 5, 2025

The case for diplomacy with Iran

By Geoff LaMear

With Iran reportedly affirming its desire to return to the negotiating table on its nuclear capabilities, the United States has a rare opportunity. There is a confluence of American and Iranian interests to navigate the nuclear weaponisation issue through a deal, hastened by Israel’s divergent ambition to resolve it by military means. As in the 12-day War, the United States is likely to become entangled in such an outcome; but the United States is in the driver’s seat, and there are ample opportunities for securing American interests without a costly war.

Since the 12-day War’s conclusion, time has taken on different significance. Before the war, Iran retained a nuclear threshold option; it had uranium enriched up to 60 per cent, with 90 per cent required for weaponisation. This gave Iran a deterrent to discourage an American or Israeli attack. If attacked, it could develop a nuclear weapon in weeks. Now, Iran no longer has the “race to the bomb” option. With its highly enriched uranium (HEU) stockpiles destroyed by American bombers, there is not an imminent threat of Iran tipping over from threshold status into a nuclear power. But now the clock is ticking from a different direction—Israel.

Israel has been systematic in dismantling Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” proxy network since October 7, 2023. Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Iran’s patchwork of groups in Syria have been severely degraded in the ensuing two years, opening the path for Israel to deliver a knockout blow against Iran. But Washington’s aim was to neutralise Iran’s nuclear program, while Tel Aviv had the more audacious aim of regime change. These objectives have not changed. From Israel’s perspective, a nuclear deal negotiated by President Trump is not just undesirable, but perilous. President Trump is the only figure with the political capital to negotiate with Iran without the deal being ripped up later. A nuclear deal therefore threatens Israel’s maximalist aims. If a deal looks imminent, the Israelis will likely attempt to play a spoiler role. The United States should call their bluff.

Read at Critic

Author

Photo of Geoff Lamear

Geoff
LaMear

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edMiddle East

The real problem with cozying up to the Saudis

By Benjamin Friedman and Rosemary Kelanic

December 5, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Donald Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support

By Daniel DePetris

December 2, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Iran escalates nuclear stand off

By Daniel DePetris

November 22, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Alliances

Saudi Arabia and the U.S. are not allies—no matter what their leaders say

By Daniel DePetris

November 19, 2025

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy

Keep the U.S.-Saudi relationship modest

By Rosemary Kelanic

November 19, 2025

op-edMiddle East

President Donald Trump should tread carefully with Saudi Arabia

By Daniel DePetris

November 18, 2025

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved