Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / The bad and good news about Iran’s nuclear program
Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

September 5, 2023

The bad and good news about Iran’s nuclear program

By Daniel DePetris

The International Atomic Energy Agency, the world’s chief nuclear watchdog, leaked snippets of its latest quarterly report about Iran’s nuclear program last week. The picture is, at best, murky: good news wrapped in bad news, wrapped in confusion and ambivalence about the way ahead.

First, the bad news: Tehran remains extremely uncooperative with the IAEA’s investigations about its past nuclear work. Despite an agreement in March that sought to improve the nuclear agency’s ability to do its job, Iran has yet to implement fully what it signed onto. The IAEA has reinstalled some, but not all, of the cameras the Iranians previously ripped out in retaliation for U.S. sanctions. The information scooped up by those cameras is being kept by Tehran, which means the IAEA can’t even see the footage.

The investigations are stalled due to a lack of Iranian cooperation. IAEA staffers are having difficulty getting the required documentation to enter Iran, and Tehran’s stockpile of 60% enriched uranium continues to grow in the meantime. All of this led the IAEA to inform the board that “no progress” has been made in monitoring Iran’s nuclear activities.

Now, the good news: As uncooperative as the Iranians are, Tehran has nonetheless dialed back some technical aspects of its nuclear work. The Iranians aren’t adding many more advanced centrifuges. While Iran’s stock of 60% enriched uranium has grown, the increase was marginal compared to the previous quarter, slowing from 20 kilograms per month to 6.5. Some may view this decrease as irrelevant, but it does represent a faint degree of hope to U.S. officials who have spent years working on the Iran file, often with little to show for it.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What Israel’s Qatar strike on Hamas reveals

By Daniel DePetris

September 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What does Trump want in Gaza?

By Daniel DePetris

September 4, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Sanctions

Why European countries want to reimpose harsh sanctions on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Syria

Donald Trump tries to make history in Syria and Lebanon

By Daniel DePetris

August 26, 2025

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved