Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Syria’s tribal violence threatens U.S. troops
Syria, Middle East

September 5, 2024

Syria’s tribal violence threatens U.S. troops

By Alexander Langlois

In early August, northeast Syria experienced a major uptick in violence unseen since nearly identical fighting broke out between the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and local Arab tribes one year ago. The latest outbreak offers a crucial case study on a common dynamic in Syria after roughly thirteen years of conflict—namely, the frequent increase in violence stemming from unresolved issues in what many describe as a “frozen” conflict. Such dynamics inhibit efforts to end the crisis, leaving Syrians and international forces in the country trapped in what can only be described as a low-level quagmire for all involved—especially the 900 U.S. troops deployed to the country.

The latest round of hostilities between the SDF and regime-aligned Arab tribes began as early as August 6, with numerous tribal fighters crossing the regime-held eastern bank of the Euphrates River in Syria’s northeastern Deir Ezzor Governorate. The attack focused on many of the same towns as the year prior, spanning most of the governorate’s riverbank cities from Kobar to Al Bagouz, alongside fighting as far north as Sur. Heavy fighting concentrated on major towns in the central part of the governorate—specifically al-Sabhah, al-Busayrah, al-Shuhail, Dhiban, al-Tayyanah, Abu Hardoub, Abu Hammam, al-Kishkiyah, and Gharanij.

The SDF responded to the attacks by blockading regime-held security zones in Hassakeh and Qamishli—centers of power for the group, given the large Kurdish populations there. The decision to lay siege to these areas resembles similar SDF actions in the past when tensions escalated with the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his allies. Such moves, alongside crossline trade closures, are designed to heap pressure on the regime for eventual negotiations to end disputes—tactics the regime replicates.

Read at The National Interest

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

How Trump can avoid ‘owning’ Gaza

By William Walldorf

October 28, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Now is not the time for new U.S. commitments to the Middle East

By William Walldorf

October 21, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Did decisive U.S. action restore deterrence—or has Washington simply been lucky?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

October 16, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Daniel Davis assesses the first phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal on NewsNation

Featuring Daniel Davis

October 15, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Donald Trump declares a new dawn in the Middle East. The reality is a little more complicated.

By Daniel DePetris

October 14, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Has Trump secured peace in the Middle East?

By Daniel DePetris

October 13, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved