Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic
Grand strategy, Americas, China, Europe and Eurasia, Great power competition, Russia

August 22, 2024

Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic

By Andrew Latham

The Arctic, once a peripheral region, has emerged as a pivotal geopolitical stage.

As the world order transitions from unipolarity to a more multipolar landscape, competition for influence and resources in the high north has intensified. For Canada, a nation with extensive Arctic territory and a long-standing commitment to the region, this dynamic presents both challenges and opportunities.

Canada occupies a unique geopolitical position. Unlike many other middle powers, its vast Arctic domain grants it a degree of leverage disproportionate to its overall global influence. This geographic advantage, coupled with its rich natural resources and stable democratic institutions, positions Canada as a key player in shaping the Arctic’s future. However, the challenges are substantial, requiring a sophisticated and nuanced approach to policy-making.

The actions of Russia and China in the Arctic pose significant threats to Canadian, North American, and NATO security interests. Russia, with its extensive Arctic coastline and robust military presence, has been assertive in staking its claim to the region. Moscow’s military modernization, including the deployment of advanced weapon systems, underscores its determination to project power in the Arctic. While overt aggression may be tempered by economic vulnerabilities, Russia’s capacity to disrupt critical infrastructure, such as undersea cables or satellite communications, poses a significant risk.

China, adopting a more economically focused approach, is also increasingly active in the Arctic. Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, while primarily focused on Eurasian connectivity, has implications for the region. China’s growing economic and technological influence, coupled with its strategic ambitions, necessitates close monitoring and a proactive Canadian response.

Read at The Hill Times

Author

Photo of Andrew Latham

Andrew
Latham

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edGrand strategy

DOGE Has Its Sights on the Defense Department

By Gil Barndollar

May 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Big, Bloated Defense Budget

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances

Geography has given the US unrivaled security. Trump is destroying it

By Gil Barndollar and Rajan Menon

May 4, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Israel‑Hamas

The frenetic foreign policy of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days

By Daniel DePetris

April 29, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump is learning America isn’t as powerful as he thought

By Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, Drones

Trump’s idea to use drones strikes in Mexico could make cartel violence worse

By Daniel DePetris

April 10, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved