Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic
Grand strategy, Americas, China, Europe and Eurasia, Great power competition, Russia

August 22, 2024

Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic

By Andrew Latham

The Arctic, once a peripheral region, has emerged as a pivotal geopolitical stage.

As the world order transitions from unipolarity to a more multipolar landscape, competition for influence and resources in the high north has intensified. For Canada, a nation with extensive Arctic territory and a long-standing commitment to the region, this dynamic presents both challenges and opportunities.

Canada occupies a unique geopolitical position. Unlike many other middle powers, its vast Arctic domain grants it a degree of leverage disproportionate to its overall global influence. This geographic advantage, coupled with its rich natural resources and stable democratic institutions, positions Canada as a key player in shaping the Arctic’s future. However, the challenges are substantial, requiring a sophisticated and nuanced approach to policy-making.

The actions of Russia and China in the Arctic pose significant threats to Canadian, North American, and NATO security interests. Russia, with its extensive Arctic coastline and robust military presence, has been assertive in staking its claim to the region. Moscow’s military modernization, including the deployment of advanced weapon systems, underscores its determination to project power in the Arctic. While overt aggression may be tempered by economic vulnerabilities, Russia’s capacity to disrupt critical infrastructure, such as undersea cables or satellite communications, poses a significant risk.

China, adopting a more economically focused approach, is also increasingly active in the Arctic. Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, while primarily focused on Eurasian connectivity, has implications for the region. China’s growing economic and technological influence, coupled with its strategic ambitions, necessitates close monitoring and a proactive Canadian response.

Read at The Hill Times

Author

Photo of Andrew Latham

Andrew
Latham

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

The strife in Ecuador, Mexico and Haiti is easy to miss in our frenetic news cycle

July 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

ExplainerAmericas, Air power, Counterterrorism

No GWOT-Narco

By Daniel DePetris and Christopher McCallion

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Alliances

US reviewing AUKUS submarine pact as part of ‘America first’ agenda

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 11, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy

Trump’s cost-benefit doctrine defines foreign policy, 80 years post-WWII

Featuring Edward King

June 3, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved