Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / On the anniversary of the Iraq invasion, spare us the sermons
Middle East, Iraq

March 19, 2024

On the anniversary of the Iraq invasion, spare us the sermons

By Daniel DePetris

Twenty-one years ago today, the United States committed its worst foreign-policy mistake in generations: invading Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein, the despot who ruled the Arab country with an iron fist for nearly a quarter-century. The entire operation was supposed to be a “cakewalk,” in which the mighty US military, stocked with the best technology and weapons the world had to offer, would pummel a decrepit Iraqi army that was hobbled by international sanctions for the better part of a decade.

The mood at the time was serious but stoic. Donald Rumsfeld, the US defense secretary, argued that the entire war wouldn’t last more than five months. Rumsfeld’s deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, testified to Congress that the invasion would be cheap due to Iraq’s substantial oil revenues, which would magically pay for the conflict. Ditto Richard Perle, the chair of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, who said matter-of-factly that Iraq “can largely finance the reconstruction of their own country.”

Americans were led to believe that Saddam was a suicidal maniac who allied with al-Qaeda to kill Americans and clamoring for a nuclear weapon to explode in an American city. Vice President Dick Cheney hinted that Saddam was in cahoots with al-Qaeda despite what the US intelligence community assessed at the time — and President George W. Bush would spend months leading up to the war scaring the bejesus out of the American people. “Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists,” Bush said during a speech in October 2002.

History demonstrated long ago how foolish those confident predictions and talking points were. With the exception of the Iraqi army’s collapse after a few weeks, all of them turned out to be sheer nonsense. Saddam gave up on his nuclear ambitions after the 1991 Gulf War, and as author Steven Coll amply explores in his new book, The Achilles Trap, Saddam’s regime was toying with international inspectors not because he had weapons of mass destruction but rather because he was paranoid about US spies infiltrating the inspectors’ ranks. The US spent trillions of dollars on the war and is still paying for it due to the tens of thousands of US troops who were grievously injured. The US invasion broke Iraq’s social construct: with the dictator now gone, the country’s oppressed majority Shia population were now free to take matters into its own hands, scooping up an ever greater amount of political power for itself.

Read at The Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved