Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Now is the time to repeal the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs
Grand strategy, Middle East

November 21, 2024

Now is the time to repeal the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs

By Demri Greggo

Congress is back in session and with the results of the 2024 election behind us, members have a long list of items that need to get done before the new year. One item that should be added to the top of that list is a repeal of the 2002 and 1991 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMFs).

Repealing the pair of AUMFs should be a no-brainer. Keeping the authorizations on the books gives any president the legal authority to surge troops to the Middle East, even though decades have passed since the authorizations were drafted. Both the Iraq War and Gulf War are now over, meaning the AUMFs have overstayed their welcome in U.S. Code. Most importantly, the AUMFs are not used as the sole domestic legal justification for any active operations by the United States.

The 2002 and 1991 AUMFs are also not the only tool in the toolbox. Even if the AUMFs are repealed, the president can use Article II of the U.S. Constitution as legal justification if force is warranted to defend the United States. If he needs additional domestic legal authority, he can make his case to Congress, as Presidents have historically done in times of crisis.

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Demri
Greggo

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Middle East

The US must restrain itself from being too involved in Syria’s redevelopment

By Daniel DePetris

June 10, 2025

In the mediaHouthis, Iran, Middle East, Military analysis, Naval power

Red Sea passage remains a no-go for shipping despite U.S. action

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 5, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Houthis, Iran, Middle East, Syria

Under Donald Trump, Restraint Is Winning

By Alexander Langlois

June 4, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East

Iran does not accept the US proposal. The US does not accept Iran’s request. What is the third way?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 3, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

The False Binary at the Heart of Trump’s Iran Strategy

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 2, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Yemen

Trump needs to stop involving himself in Middle East drama

By Christopher McCallion

May 29, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved