Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / How does Joe Biden’s foreign policy record stack up?
Grand strategy, Afghanistan, Ukraine

July 23, 2024

How does Joe Biden’s foreign policy record stack up?

By Daniel DePetris

President Joe Biden’s decision to pull out of the race on Sunday afternoon shocked the country. A day earlier, the president was talking as if his campaign was full steam ahead. His change of heart left even some of his closest advisers in the White House bewildered.

Much will be written in the next several days about why Biden bowed out. But there’s an altogether different conversation to be had, and it centers on legacy. How does Biden stack up compared with other presidents on the big, meaty questions of foreign policy? Did he try to do too much? Too little?
And was he all that successful?

Biden was arguably the most experienced foreign policy hand to enter the White House since the late George H.W. Bush. Starting with his election to the Senate in 1972, Biden took a particular interest in international relations. His 36-year career in the upper chamber included three stints as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He delivered countless speeches on the international news stories of the day, wrote op-eds proposing unconventional schemes (one of the more infamous was a 2006 piece he co-wrote proposing that Iraq be split into three autonomous zones along sectarian lines) and led congressional delegations on foreign trips abroad.

During his eight years as vice president, Biden managed the Ukraine file, where he was a vocal proponent within Barack Obama’s administration of giving Kyiv more support to deal with the Russia-backed rebellions in eastern Ukraine. Notably, Biden was also the one person who tried to talk Obama out of sending another 30,000 U.S. troops into Afghanistan, a position that he believed would bog down the U.S. down even further into a quagmire.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Golden Dome is a destabilizing pipe dream

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 26, 2026

Op-edMexico, Western Hemisphere

How El Mencho’s death in Mexico could make drug cartel violence worse

By Daniel DePetris

February 24, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Venezuela

In Cuba, is Trump seeking ouster of Communist leaders, or of China’s presence?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

February 16, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere

The U.S. wrecking ball returns to Munich

Featuring Benjamin Friedman and Daniel DePetris

February 13, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Grand strategy, Russia

Trump awards final contracts under U.S.-Finnish icebreaker partnership to Canada-linked defense company

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 11, 2026

In the mediaVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

Is Venezuela Any Closer to Democracy? Newsweek Writers Debate

Featuring Daniel DePetris

February 11, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: How does it deal with defense deficits?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.