Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Here are New Year’s resolutions for U.S. foreign policy
Grand strategy, Asia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

December 31, 2024

Here are New Year’s resolutions for U.S. foreign policy

By Daniel DePetris

The end of the year is always bittersweet. On the one hand, it’s a time of joy and happiness, when loved ones come into town for the holidays. Yet on the other hand, there’s always the thought of how it’ll feel to go back to normal after New Year’s Day, when the routine starts up again.

This period, however, should also serve as a moment of reflection. What did we do right over the last 12 months? What did we do wrong? And what changes do I have to make to become a better person? Compiling a list of New Year’s resolutions is as American as apple pie.

New Year’s resolutions aren’t only for regular people. They also apply to the men and women in Washington who are responsible for crafting public policy, particularly if they happen to be members of the vast U.S. foreign policy establishment. These policymakers have made their fair share of mistakes over the last year just like the rest of us.

The list of mistakes is as wide as it is deep. In the Middle East, the United States has very little, if anything, to show for its diplomatic efforts. U.S. officials expend significant time, energy and resources playing peacemaker in a region synonymous in the American mind with pain, sunk costs and crisis. The war between Israel and Hamas grinds on despite periodic cease-fire talks, with the Palestinian death toll approaching 46,000. Lebanon is only just starting to rebuild after Israel’s monthslong air and ground offensive against Hezbollah. A tyrant in Syria is gone, providing millions of Syrians with hope for a better future, but that future could still go either way. Iran, meanwhile, is as close to a nuclear weapon as it has ever been.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Op-edWestern Hemisphere, Mexico, Venezuela

Trump Is Getting His Way in Latin America. But Bully Tactics Have a Cost—and the Bill Is Coming Due

By Daniel DePetris

March 30, 2026

Q&AGrand strategy, Cuba, Western Hemisphere

Will U.S. pressure lead to regime collapse in Cuba?

By Daniel DePetris

March 27, 2026

In the mediaCuba, Western Hemisphere

¿Podría Cuba resistir una intervención militar de EE. UU.?

Featuring Daniel DePetris

March 24, 2026

Op-edCuba, Western Hemisphere

Pursue negotiations, not regime change, in Cuba

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 18, 2026

Op-edCuba, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s Cuba strategy is straightforward. The outcome will be anything but.

By Daniel DePetris

March 15, 2026

Op-edCuba, Western Hemisphere

Trump can win in Cuba without regime change

By Daniel DePetris

March 10, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: How does it deal with defense deficits?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.