Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Biden’s foreign policy meant little more than retreat, equivocation, and surrender
Grand strategy, Alliances

October 28, 2024

Biden’s foreign policy meant little more than retreat, equivocation, and surrender

By Daniel DePetris

All presidents vacate the White House hoping to be remembered in the history books. Many past holders of the office have succeeded in this endeavour.

Richard Nixon, most remembered for resigning in disgrace after the Watergate scandal, was nonetheless a savvy foreign policy operator who promoted détente with the Soviet Union and turned the page on U.S. relations with China. Jimmy Carter, caricatured as one of America’s worst commanders-in-chief, brokered the Camp David Accords that established peace between Israel and Egypt after multiple wars between them. Ronald Reagan presided over landmark arms control agreements with the Soviet Union; George H W Bush will be remembered for the resounding U.S. victory in Operation Desert Storm. Barack Obama and Donald Trump had their own signature diplomatic initiatives, the Iran nuclear deal and the Abraham Accords respectively.

President Joe Biden’s four years are different. It’s difficult to parse through his record and come away with a memorable foreign policy accomplishment. Asked to name one, Biden’s supporters frequently tout the president’s mastery in alliance building, particularly in Asia, where U.S. relations with Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines all improved under his watch. Ties between the U.S. and Germany are far better today than they were four years ago. And to Biden’s credit, U.S. troops are no longer fighting a pointless, unending counterinsurgency against the Taliban in Afghanistan that drained U.S. military resources and distracted Washington from more important national security priorities.

Read at The Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Op-edMexico, Western Hemisphere

Why the CIA deaths are a problem for Mexico

By Daniel DePetris

April 25, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Venezuela

Budgetary Costs of U.S. Military Operations in Venezuela, the Caribbean, and the Eastern Pacific, August 1, 2025 – March 31, 2026

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 23, 2026

Op-edCuba, Western Hemisphere

Trump can get a win in Cuba, but not with military force

By Adam Gallagher

April 23, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere

Trump Has Already Spent at Least $4.7 Billion Attacking Latin America

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 23, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere, Mexico, Venezuela

Trump Is Getting His Way in Latin America. But Bully Tactics Have a Cost—and the Bill Is Coming Due

By Daniel DePetris

March 30, 2026

Q&AGrand strategy, Cuba, Western Hemisphere

Will U.S. pressure lead to regime collapse in Cuba?

By Daniel DePetris

March 27, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.