Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel / An Israel-Hezbollah war would devour the Middle East
Israel, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

June 29, 2024

An Israel-Hezbollah war would devour the Middle East

By Alexander Langlois

After nine months of brutal fighting in Gaza, Israel and Lebanese Hezbollah appear poised to escalate ongoing hostilities into a broader war. Indeed, both sides are saber-rattling as Israel finalizes heavy operations in Gaza to shift focus to the Lebanon front, with Israel particularly committed to ensuring an enduring defeat of its northern foe. This reality should terrify world leaders who must publicly reject any potential conflict, given the potential for mass displacement on par with the 2015–16 refugee crisis.

Lebanon and Hezbollah have exchanged cross-border fire since October 8—one day after Hamas attacked Israel. Both parties have increased their fiery rhetoric and actions since, expanding the scope and scale of their military operations, targeting increasingly important figures and locations while promising a broader bloody war. Critically, the situation appears to fall outside the normal deterrence structure established after the 2006 war between the two parties.

Israeli leaders are not holding back in public statements, with Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant repeating prior threats that his country will send Lebanon “back to the stone age” on June 27. This and similar rhetoric from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu highlight Israel’s willingness to invade Lebanon.

Hezbollah’s rhetoric is no different, although it and its sponsor, Iran, appear less inclined to start a full-fledged war. Still, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah on June 26 claimed that a future fight will have “no rules and no red lines.” This followed the group’s release of drone footage within Israeli airspace that highlights the group’s capacity to strike critical infrastructure—a clear signal that it will Israeli harm done to Lebanon inside Israel.

Read at The National Interest

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Press ReleaseUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Escalation against Iran increases risks to U.S. troops

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 20, 2026

Op-edIsrael, Middle East

Why Lebanon’s Trilateral Framework Is a Recipe for Disaster

By Alexander Langlois

July 20, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The U.S.-Iran War Cannot End Without U.S. Pressure on Israel in Lebanon

By Alexander Langlois

July 20, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

It’s Time To Walk Away From the Iran War

By Adam Gallagher

July 15, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The U.S. and Iran Reckon With Shrinking Options to End the War

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 15, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump can’t escape the Iran war

By Daniel DePetris

July 14, 2026

Events on Israel

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.