Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel / An Israel-Hezbollah war would devour the Middle East
Israel, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

June 29, 2024

An Israel-Hezbollah war would devour the Middle East

By Alexander Langlois

After nine months of brutal fighting in Gaza, Israel and Lebanese Hezbollah appear poised to escalate ongoing hostilities into a broader war. Indeed, both sides are saber-rattling as Israel finalizes heavy operations in Gaza to shift focus to the Lebanon front, with Israel particularly committed to ensuring an enduring defeat of its northern foe. This reality should terrify world leaders who must publicly reject any potential conflict, given the potential for mass displacement on par with the 2015–16 refugee crisis.

Lebanon and Hezbollah have exchanged cross-border fire since October 8—one day after Hamas attacked Israel. Both parties have increased their fiery rhetoric and actions since, expanding the scope and scale of their military operations, targeting increasingly important figures and locations while promising a broader bloody war. Critically, the situation appears to fall outside the normal deterrence structure established after the 2006 war between the two parties.

Israeli leaders are not holding back in public statements, with Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant repeating prior threats that his country will send Lebanon “back to the stone age” on June 27. This and similar rhetoric from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu highlight Israel’s willingness to invade Lebanon.

Hezbollah’s rhetoric is no different, although it and its sponsor, Iran, appear less inclined to start a full-fledged war. Still, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah on June 26 claimed that a future fight will have “no rules and no red lines.” This followed the group’s release of drone footage within Israeli airspace that highlights the group’s capacity to strike critical infrastructure—a clear signal that it will Israeli harm done to Lebanon inside Israel.

Read at The National Interest

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

There is no ceasefire in Gaza

By Alexander Langlois

October 31, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

How Trump can avoid ‘owning’ Gaza

By William Walldorf

October 28, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Now is not the time for new U.S. commitments to the Middle East

By William Walldorf

October 21, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Did decisive U.S. action restore deterrence—or has Washington simply been lucky?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

October 16, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Daniel Davis assesses the first phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal on NewsNation

Featuring Daniel Davis

October 15, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Donald Trump declares a new dawn in the Middle East. The reality is a little more complicated.

By Daniel DePetris

October 14, 2025

Events on Israel

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved