Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / America’s ambassador selection system needs an overhaul
Grand strategy

August 2, 2023

America’s ambassador selection system needs an overhaul

By Anthony Constantini

Former President Donald Trump, the current Republican primary front-runner, recently released an ambitious plan to rework the federal bureaucracy. While this plan—the centerpiece being Schedule F, which would allow Mr. Trump to fire up to 50,000 federal workers and replace them with loyalists—has been soundly rejected by his Democratic opposition, it does speak to a bipartisan desire to remake the federal government to be more responsive and democratic.

But one area of the federal government has been overlooked when it comes to reform: foreign policy bureaucracy and, in particular, America’s system of ambassadorial selection.

Any future president wishing to truly change establishment foreign policy will need to grapple with a deeply embedded and ideological foreign policy bureaucracy that is predisposed against change. In changing how they select ambassadors, presidents could provide themselves with solutions to this problem.

Read at Washington Times

Author

Photo of Anthony Constantini

Anthony
Constantini

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaIran, Diplomacy, Middle East, U.S.‑Iran

Trump talks peace in the Middle East as he readies war on Iran

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

February 20, 2026

Taiwan soldiers engage in a drill to defend the island's beaches.
Q&AChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China, Taiwan

How realistic is a Chinese invasion of Taiwan?

By Lyle Goldstein

February 20, 2026

op-edAsia, China, Taiwan

The risks and opportunities of Sanae Takaichi’s big triumph in Japan

By Lyle Goldstein

February 20, 2026

op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

op-edGrand strategy

How Trump’s Board of Peace is set up for a multibillion dollar fail

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 19, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East, U.S.‑Iran

Trump should step back from the brink with Iran

By Alexander Langlois

February 18, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved