Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / All the reasons Trump should resist regime change in Iran
Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

January 20, 2026

All the reasons Trump should resist regime change in Iran

By Thomas P. Cavanna

Since early January, President Trump has committed several times to intervening in Iran should its regime violently repress domestic protests, explaining that the U.S. was “locked and loaded and ready to go,” and that Tehran would “get hit very hard.”

Trump made similar threats before. But the coup that Washington launched on January 3 to depose Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro suggests he may be serious about conducting regime change in Iran. That would be a colossal mistake. Though the U.S. could still get entangled in Venezuela, Iran is a much larger country, far from Washington’s “backyard,” and in a deeply unstable region.

Yet regime change has ardent supporters in America’s establishment. Israel also endorses the goal.

Since his return to power, Trump has intensified Washington’s sanctions. Despite reassuring intelligence estimates, he decided, right before new talks with Tehran, to join the strikes campaign that Israel had launched in mid-June last year against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

During that 12-day war, he portrayed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei as an “easy target” and evoked regime change (although he backtracked later). In late December, he proclaimed that America and Israel would “knock [Iran] down” should it revive its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Read at Asia Times

Author

Thomas P.
Cavanna

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump’s global gunboat diplomacy leaves the U.S. overstretched

By Alexander Langlois

February 3, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Ignore the Hawks. Attacking Iran comes with huge risks

By Peter Harris

February 1, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. should pull the plug on its Syria deployment

By Daniel DePetris

February 1, 2026

op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria

Trump’s Middle East policy is teetering on overextension

By William Walldorf

January 29, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. is adapting its Syria strategy. Here’s why that’s a problem.

By Alexander Langlois

January 28, 2026

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved