Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / Air Force leaders are right to rethink NGAD
Iran, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

November 5, 2024

Air Force leaders are right to rethink NGAD

By Daniel DePetris

Late last month, Israel executed a three-round airstrike campaign on Iranian military targets in retaliation for Tehran’s ballistic missile attack some three weeks earlier. Approximately 20 Iranian military sites were hit, and the Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted about its success after the operation concluded. According to Israeli officials, Tehran’s missile production capability was severely damaged to the point in which it may take a year before Iran can rebuild it. (Iran still has hundreds of ballistic missiles.)

The Iranian government largely played down the attack. Iranian military officials insisted the Israeli strikes caused only limited damage. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, delivered a speech in which he said the Israeli attack shouldn’t be “exaggerated or downplayed,” deliberately vague phrasing that was likely meant as a placeholder as his government debated what to do next.

The rhetoric from Iran, however, has gotten noticeably more violent in the days since Khamenei gave that speech. On Thursday, Gen. Ali Fadavi, the second in command of Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, told Iranian media that there would be a definite Iranian response. An official in the supreme leader’s office offered more fire-breathing invective. Khamenei, who a few days prior was telling people not to overreact, apparently had a change of heart over the weekend, vowing a “crushing response” against either Israel or the United States.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Here’s how Trump can fix Jimmy Carter’s mistake on Iran and oil

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

March 18, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The war in Iran is beginning to grate on Donald Trump

By Daniel DePetris

March 17, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East

The U.S. war on Iran could make Europe even more dependent on Washington

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 17, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Washington’s War in Iran Will Encourage Nuclear Proliferation

By Alex Madajian

March 17, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Why oil tankers remain hesitant to travel the Strait of Hormuz, according to experts

Featuring Eugene Gholz

March 17, 2026

Op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Middle East

Why the Second Phase of Donald Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan Is Failing

By Alexander Langlois

March 16, 2026

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.