Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Nuclear weapons / A panicked case for nuclear weapons modernization
Nuclear weapons, Grand strategy

November 1, 2023

A panicked case for nuclear weapons modernization

By Scott Strgacich

A little-noticed bipartisan report released last month calls for the United States to take part in a new nuclear arms race. The unceremonious debut of the Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States flew largely under the radar of a foreign policy commentariat presently encaptivated by Hamas’ attacks on Israel and the conflict that has erupted in Gaza.

The report was, however, noticed by a slew of nuclear experts who were dismayed by its hawkish contents. Naturally, they took to X (formally Twitter) to scorch it. Hans Kristensen at the Federation of American Scientists argued the report “reads more like a nuclear industry pitch than a Congressional study.” Carnegie’s Ankit Panda said it was “all too predictable.” Nuclear analyst Pavel Podvig simply called it “garbage.”

Yet, the report’s relevance goes well beyond niche online policy discourses — and its recommendations for the future of America’s nuclear forces are as disturbing as its title is antiseptic. Simply put, it says the United States needs to develop more nuclear forces, and faster.

Read at Inkstick

Author

Photo of Scott Strgacich

Scott
Strgacich

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

ExplainerAmericas, Air power, Counterterrorism

No GWOT-Narco

By Daniel DePetris and Christopher McCallion

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Alliances

US reviewing AUKUS submarine pact as part of ‘America first’ agenda

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 11, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy

Trump’s cost-benefit doctrine defines foreign policy, 80 years post-WWII

Featuring Edward King

June 3, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

Don’t go down to Mexico

By John Kitch II

May 31, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

DOGE Has Its Sights on the Defense Department

By Gil Barndollar

May 9, 2025

Events on Nuclear weapons

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualChina, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: Raising the minimum: explaining China’s nuclear buildup

May 19, 2022
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved