Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Military analysis / The Defense Department’s 8 percent challenge: What to cut and where to invest
Military analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Drones, Grand strategy, Land power, Naval power

March 21, 2025

The Defense Department’s 8 percent challenge: What to cut and where to invest

On March 21, AEI’s Todd Harrison and the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Seamus P. Daniels hosted Melissa Dalton of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Defense Priorities’ Jennifer Kavanagh, AEI’s Elaine McCusker, and Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution to discuss how the Department of Defense can cut and reinvest 8 percent from its budget, in line with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s guidance. All the panelists used AEI’s Defense Futures Simulator to process the cuts and reinvestments.

Broad themes from the experts’ decision-making included cuts to the Army, largely reinvested in the Navy and the other services; investments in air and missile defense and missiles and munitions at the cost of other categories not related to lethality; and, strategically, cuts to the force structure in favor of modernization and operational readiness plans. All the panelists stressed how difficult this exercise was and emphasized the need to take a strategic approach to cuts and reinvestments.

Watch at American Enterprise Institution

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

The Latest

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

What Does the Iran War Mean for the Global Economy?

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 2, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere

Donald Trump will have high demands for whoever wins Colombia’s presidential election

By Daniel DePetris

June 2, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Trump Steps Back From the Brink on Taiwan

By Lyle Goldstein

June 2, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Events on Military analysis

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: How does it deal with defense deficits?

February 9, 2026
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualWestern Hemisphere, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Toward Western Hemisphere dominance?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.