Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Military analysis / In brief: How to improve the foreign military sales process
Military analysis, Air power, Drones, Land power, Naval power

April 22, 2025

In brief: How to improve the foreign military sales process

The United States should be more selective about which countries it sells defense products to, accepting fewer clients to ensure that scarce defense industrial capacity is allocated to best support U.S. national security goals.

A more selective process would sell high-demand, low-supply systems — like air defense and precision munitions — only to partners that play a direct role in advancing U.S. security interests. Potential clients and orders should be prioritized according to their alignment with the U.S. defense strategy. Countries might rank highly because they have committed to fight alongside the United States in a contingency or because they can reduce the U.S. defense burden by protecting themselves.

This approach would reduce wait times for high-priority clients, limit transactions made more for the sake of revenue than U.S. interests, and increase the strategic value the United States derives from defense sales. Though it would halt sales to low-priority clients, defense contractors would still face demand that far exceeds supply, so their bottom lines should not suffer.

Read at War on the Rocks

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran

Trump said Iran’s oil pipelines will soon ‘explode.’ Energy experts doubt it.

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

April 30, 2026

Q&AIran, US‑Israel‑Iran

How the U.S. can end the Iran war now

By Benjamin Friedman

April 30, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Asia, China, Iran, Middle East

Iran killed any delusions of U.S. military domination over China

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 29, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East

Friedrich Merz’s Iran intervention won’t discourage Trump

By Daniel DePetris

April 28, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, NATO, US‑Israel‑Iran

Will King Charles’ visit help soften the animus between the U.S. and the UK?

By Daniel DePetris

April 28, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Naval power

The U.S. Shouldn’t Rule the Seas Forever

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 27, 2026

Events on Military analysis

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: How does it deal with defense deficits?

February 9, 2026
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualWestern Hemisphere, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Toward Western Hemisphere dominance?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.