Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Military analysis / In brief: How to improve the foreign military sales process
Military analysis, Air power, Drones, Land power, Naval power

April 22, 2025

In brief: How to improve the foreign military sales process

The United States should be more selective about which countries it sells defense products to, accepting fewer clients to ensure that scarce defense industrial capacity is allocated to best support U.S. national security goals.

A more selective process would sell high-demand, low-supply systems — like air defense and precision munitions — only to partners that play a direct role in advancing U.S. security interests. Potential clients and orders should be prioritized according to their alignment with the U.S. defense strategy. Countries might rank highly because they have committed to fight alongside the United States in a contingency or because they can reduce the U.S. defense burden by protecting themselves.

This approach would reduce wait times for high-priority clients, limit transactions made more for the sake of revenue than U.S. interests, and increase the strategic value the United States derives from defense sales. Though it would halt sales to low-priority clients, defense contractors would still face demand that far exceeds supply, so their bottom lines should not suffer.

Read at War on the Rocks

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaAmericas

Trump’s feud with Colombian leader threatens U.S. antidrug efforts

Featuring Daniel DePetris

October 28, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Asia

President Donald Trump wants to meet with Kim Jong Un again. But what about Kim?

By Daniel DePetris

October 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

How Trump can avoid ‘owning’ Gaza

By William Walldorf

October 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Asia, China

America shouldn’t pivot to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 28, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Venezuela

Defining a Monroe doctrine for the Caribbean

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 27, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Trump should stay the course on China

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 27, 2025

Events on Military analysis

See All Events
virtualAmericas, Air power, Military analysis

A new war next door? The case against U.S. military strikes in Mexico

July 17, 2025
virtualMilitary analysis, Naval power

Naval power: American shipbuilding capacity and competition with China

May 27, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved