Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Military analysis / Chinese scientists say they’ve found a way to make hypersonic missiles skip in the sky to strike deeper. U.S. experts aren’t convinced it’ll be effective.
Military analysis, Asia, China, Land power

August 14, 2024

Chinese scientists say they’ve found a way to make hypersonic missiles skip in the sky to strike deeper. U.S. experts aren’t convinced it’ll be effective.

A full Chinese hypersonic arsenal with an extended range would have serious military implications, Jennifer Kavanagh, director of Military Analysis at Washington-based think tank Defense Priorities, told Business Insider.

It would mean that the People’s Liberation Army can launch these weapons from far inside China and still strike deep into American territory, potentially in the Pacific Ocean or even Hawaii or the US mainland, Kavanagh said.

“It will be easier for the PLA to protect—and harder for the United States to find and target—missile systems based deep inside China than those that must be positioned along the coast,” she said.

Skip-gliding missiles may also be harder to track and intercept, she added.

But this research only involved simulations and not actual missile tests, Kavanagh said. Even if China were able to translate this into a practical weapon, it would likely be expensive and complicated to produce.

“Theory and practice can be very different when it comes to missile ranges,” said Kavanagh.

Hypersonic missiles are especially difficult to maneuver as they get faster, and they tend to heat up quickly at top speeds.

Kavanagh noted that a future skip-gliding missile would likely still be detectable from hundreds of miles away.

Read at Business Insider

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edAsia, Burden sharing, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

Events on Military analysis

See All Events
virtualAmericas, Air power, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: A new war next door? The case against U.S. military strikes in Mexico

July 17, 2025
virtualMilitary analysis, Naval power

Past Virtual Event: Naval power: American shipbuilding capacity and competition with China

May 27, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved