Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Global posture / A U.S. defense strategy is coming, just not from the president
Global posture, Grand strategy

July 28, 2025

A U.S. defense strategy is coming, just not from the president

Top
Jump to Section
  1. Featuring
A glimpse of the numbers and timelines of such a strategy can be inferred from work by Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell at the think tank Defense Priorities. Caldwell is notable because he was in the Pentagon, near Colby and close to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—until Hegseth fired him and others amid an outbreak of paranoia over leaks.
Kavanagh and Caldwell recommend that the U.S. reduce its military presence in Europe from roughly 90,000 service members in uniform now to about 30,000 in the next three years, and to 20,000 within a decade. Air and naval forces in Europe would be halved, and then reduced to a minimum. In the Middle East, where the U.S. has about 40,000 service members and lots of floating and flying kit, they recommend closing bases and withdrawing fighter squadrons and carrier groups. The total American footprint in that region would shrink by two-thirds. In South Korea, where the U.S. has about 28,000 military personnel, Kavanagh and Caldwell suggest withdrawing more than half during this term and almost all in the coming years.
By contrast, they’d leave most of the 55,000 American troops in Japan, as well as the contingents in the Philippines and other Asian and Pacific locations, although they’d move them around to make them less vulnerable to Chinese attacks. And they’d double down on AUKUS, a pact among the U.S., Britain and Australia that will bring more American nuclear-powered submarines to the region. (Notably, Colby seems skeptical about AUKUS, and has put that budding alliance under review.)

Read at Bloomberg

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

Dan
Caldwell

Former Public Policy Advisor

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

This Is The Biggest Reason Why U.S.-Iran Negotiations Fell Through Without A Deal: Expert

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 15, 2026

In the mediaChina, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump’s Hormuz blockade unlikely to draw China into Iran war

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

April 15, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump Isolation Deepens on World Stage as Allies Rebuff, Condemn

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

April 15, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump Risks Showdown With Xi Before Summit Over Hormuz Blockade

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 15, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The global ripple effects of the United States’ diplomacy with Iran

By Daniel DePetris

April 14, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Our Adversaries—And Allies—Are Learning These Lessons From U.S.-Iran Negotiations: Analyst

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 14, 2026

Events on Global posture

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy

Refusing to choose: did the global posture review fail?

December 10, 2021

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.