Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / After Syria airstrikes, what is the U.S. endgame?
Syria, Iran, Middle East

October 27, 2023

After Syria airstrikes, what is the U.S. endgame?

By Daniel DePetris

In the overnight hours on Thursday, two United States F-16 fighter jets dropped their payloads on two locations in Eastern Syria. The targets: an ammunition and a weapons storage facility operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian-backed militia proxies. The precision airstrikes were retaliation for a series of rocket and drone attacks against U.S. military positions in Iraq and Syria (19 at the time of writing).

The Biden administration is holding Iran ultimately responsible.

The strikes come as the Israel-Hamas war continues to rage, with Israeli aircraft hitting hundreds of targets in Gaza every night and Hamas continuing to send a bevy of missiles into Israel. Hundreds of thousands of Israeli forces are ready to launch a ground operation in the Hamas-ruled enclave as soon as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gives the order. When that order comes is difficult to say; the U.S. has persuaded Israel to delay a ground operation until it can rush air defense systems into the region and accelerate negotiations with Hamas over hostage releases.

U.S. officials such as Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin have been the face of the administration’s policy on the war, explaining that Israel has the right to prosecute its military campaign against Hamas but also has an obligation to do so within the laws of war. Yet, in the grand scheme, the fighting in Gaza is a sideshow to the main event: preventing a wider escalation that would draw the U.S. and Iran into a direct conflict.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Now is not the time for new U.S. commitments to the Middle East

By William Walldorf

October 21, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Did decisive U.S. action restore deterrence—or has Washington simply been lucky?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

October 16, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Daniel Davis assesses the first phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal on NewsNation

Featuring Daniel Davis

October 15, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Donald Trump declares a new dawn in the Middle East. The reality is a little more complicated.

By Daniel DePetris

October 14, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Has Trump secured peace in the Middle East?

By Daniel DePetris

October 13, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

The Gaza ceasefire is welcome, but will it end the conflict?

By Alexander Langlois

October 10, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved