Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The Cold War is over. America can let go of the old bilateral treaties.
Grand strategy, Nuclear weapons, Russia

December 11, 2023

The Cold War is over. America can let go of the old bilateral treaties.

By Anthony Constantini

The Cold War struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union was frequently described as something resembling chess. For nearly 50 years, both vied for control of the global board until only one player remained. In order to manage that dangerous game, a system of bilateral treaties was established between both players. But now, as a multipolar world emerges, the game has changed — and the old order is falling apart.

In the past few months, Russia has pulled out of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty and the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, or CFE. And earlier this year, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced Russia’s intention to suspend participation in New START, the only nuclear treaty remaining in force between Russia and America. While Russia has stated it will abide by the treaty’s limits on nuclear warheads, missiles and launchers, there is little hope for a renewal when the treaty expires in 2026.

To be clear, these pullouts go both ways: President George W. Bush pulled out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002, arguing that it hindered America’s ability to protect itself from terror. President Donald Trump took the United States out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019, claiming Russian noncompliance. And when Russia pulled out of the CFE, the West responded in kind — rendering that treaty defunct. And America has never ratified the Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

The removal of these Jenga blocks of the international order has been portrayed by some analysts as calamitous. One analyst, writing for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, declared Bush’s pullout from the ABM treaty a mistake that caused a new arms race.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Anthony Constantini

Anthony
Constantini

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Big, Bloated Defense Budget

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances

Geography has given the US unrivaled security. Trump is destroying it

By Gil Barndollar and Rajan Menon

May 4, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Israel‑Hamas

The frenetic foreign policy of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days

By Daniel DePetris

April 29, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump is learning America isn’t as powerful as he thought

By Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, Drones

Trump’s idea to use drones strikes in Mexico could make cartel violence worse

By Daniel DePetris

April 10, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Global posture

Predator or Prey? It’s the Wrong Question for Great Powers Today

By Erik Gartzke

April 7, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved