Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Debate should explore foreign policy differences
Grand strategy, China

October 22, 2020

Debate should explore foreign policy differences

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 22, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tonight, President Trump and Vice President Biden, who will debate for the last time before Election Day, are set to face questions on national security. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement:

“Nearly four years into Donald Trump’s presidency and nearly two into Joe Biden’s campaign for the job, we know oddly little about how their foreign policies will differ. If substance can seep through the rancor tonight, there’s plenty we can still learn.

“For example, both candidates say they’ll end U.S. wars. This rhetoric is welcome, but will it translate into reality? Trump hasn’t managed to end any wars, though he has made slow progress on Afghanistan. Biden says he’ll end wars while leaving counterterrorism forces there, which seems contradictory.

“We hear constant debate about China’s various sins, real and imagined, against global health and stability but little about what either candidate would do to alter the U.S. defense posture in East Asia.

“Biden criticizes Trump’s handling of allies, but there’s been little detail about what he would do differently. After all, Trump hasn’t actually jettisoned any alliance that Biden can thus restore.

“Then there is the $750 billion question of the defense budget. Might either candidate consider restraining our overly ambitious foreign policy to trim it, address our $27 trillion national debt, and focus on responding to the pandemic? Do we need to spend so much to be safe?

“These are just some of the questions Americans should have answered to inform their decisions and hold the winner accountable.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

Kavanagh and Wertheim Respond: Why Taiwan’s Survival Depends on Realistic Defense

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim

April 28, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

US should look before it leaps into South China Sea

April 18, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations

By Daniel DePetris

April 17, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved