Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Global posture / The United States isn’t back—it never left
Global posture, Grand strategy

February 4, 2021

The United States isn’t back—it never left

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 4, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden gave a speech at the State Department articulating his administration’s overarching U.S. foreign policy vision. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“President Biden said good things in his speech about putting the American people—not self-interest—first in diplomacy, the value of dissent among officials, and the need for transparency and a free press. His announcement that the U.S. will finally end support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen is good news, especially if it’s a first step toward recalibrating the U.S.-Saudi relationship and ending U.S. involvement in the other conflicts of the Middle East.

“But the speech’s major premise, that ‘America can’t afford to be absent anymore on the world stage,’ is a useful fiction for the president. The United States isn’t back—it never left. It’s true the U.S. left the Paris Climate Accords and ceased cooperation with the World Health Organization. But the U.S. did not abandon any alliances—in fact, alliances grew, with new forces sent to the Middle East in service of the foolish quasi-alliance with the Saudis, and to Eastern Europe. NATO, and thus U.S. defense commitments, expanded. No new wars were started, but all of them continued, albeit with an overdue drawdown in Afghanistan.

“The global posture review Biden announced unfortunately includes a pause to the limited drawdown of the excessive U.S. forces in Germany. It should avoid the logic that more U.S. presence and spending necessarily aids American power. True burden sharing—shifting security commitments to wealthy allies so they take more responsibility for their own defense—would strengthen the U.S. by freeing up resources while preserving stable balances of power. This more restrained approach would serve a nation committed to leading, as the president likes to say, not just by the ‘example of its power but the power of its example.’”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Global posture

In the mediaGlobal posture, Grand strategy

A U.S. defense strategy is coming, just not from the president

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 28, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

In the mediaTaiwan, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, China, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

To Protect Taiwan, Don’t Prepare to Defend It

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 29, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon is ignoring its own strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

Events on Global posture

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Refusing to choose: did the global posture review fail?

December 10, 2021

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved