Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / Mission end—not rebranding—is the best policy in Iraq
Iraq, Middle East

July 26, 2021

Mission end—not rebranding—is the best policy in Iraq

By Gil Barndollar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 26, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden announced that the U.S. combat mission in Iraq will conclude by the end of the year, with the mission set to take on an advisory character. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Gil Barndollar issued the following statement in response:

“This is old wine in new bottles. ‘Train, advise, assist’ can mean whatever the Pentagon or White House wants it to—as we saw when U.S. special operations forces engaged in harrowing combat missions in Afghanistan in 2015 and 2016, after the end of ‘combat operations.’ Operational tempo in Iraq is way down since the end of major operations against ISIS two years ago but relabeling this mission as a purely advisory effort is meaningless.

“Iraq has a difficult path ahead as it tries to walk a tightrope between the United States and Iran. But U.S. forces in Iraq, whether we call them ‘combat troops’ or not, remain vulnerable to the rockets and mortars of Iraqi militias. As the Biden administration has emphasized, America can and will support Iraq through diplomatic, economic, and information means. A continued military advisory mission is both an invitation to mission creep and an easy target for America’s foes.”

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved