Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Is Trump’s national security strategy really that important?
Grand strategy

October 16, 2025

Is Trump’s national security strategy really that important?

By Daniel DePetris

U.S. government documents are a dime a dozen. The Pentagon, for example, puts out an annual report on China’s military power and capabilities. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence releases a worldwide threat assessment every year, which Congress uses to determine what resources should be authorized and appropriated to the various U.S. intelligence agencies.

The U.S. National Security Strategy and U.S. National Defense Strategy are, however, arguably more important than any of the other U.S. government planning documents. A considerable amount of work goes into drafting, editing, and eventually releasing them, and it’s typical for the entire process to get bogged down as inter-service rivalries within the U.S. military play out. Reporters covering the national security beat are keenly eager to report on the two strategies, for good reason. Ideally, both are meant to illustrate to the American people and the world at large what Washington’s foreign policy priorities are and how the United States aims to meet them.

According to public reports, the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy will reportedly become available over the next few weeks. The National Defense Strategy, which focuses exclusively on the War Department, is running into a bit more drama as chunks of the plan continue to receive pushback from senior U.S. military officers, including Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, who believe China, commonly referred to as Washington’s peer competitor, is getting short shrift. While we don’t know the exact contents of the strategy yet, some snippets have been leaked—the Western Hemisphere and the U.S. homeland are supposedly treated as the top priorities. And while great power competition will certainly still be a feature, the strategy is likely to rub a lot of conventional national security types the wrong way.

But move the specifics aside for a moment and ask yourself a big question: do these documents really mean much anymore?

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Press ReleaseVenezuela, Americas

Pushing regime change in Venezuela is a terrible idea

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 17, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

Trump’s unconstitutional forever war against the cartels

By Daniel DePetris

October 4, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Alliances, Global posture

‘Golden Dome’ and a U.S. defence pivot create new challenges for Canada

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 3, 2025

In the mediaAmericas

Proposed ‘gang suppression force’ for Haiti to be larger, more lethal, U.S. says

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

September 26, 2025

op-edAmericas

Trump’s war on ‘narcoterrorists’ is doomed to fail

By Daniel DePetris

September 24, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Military analysis

AFSOC exercise brings concept created for great-power conflict to the Caribbean

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

September 18, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved