Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / The Trump Administration’s Lebanon Quandary
Middle East, Grand strategy, Israel

August 7, 2025

The Trump Administration’s Lebanon Quandary

By Daniel DePetris

Up until September 2024, Hezbollah, the Shia paramilitary group established in the early 1980s to fight Israel’s occupation of Lebanese territory, was Lebanon’s most powerful entity. With over 100,000 missiles and rockets in its arsenal and tens of thousands of fighters at its disposal, Hezbollah was arguably stronger than the Lebanese army. Politically, Hezbollah was a major mover-and-shaker, holding seats in the parliament and using its veto power to stall the selection of a president not to its liking. Its constellation of clinics and stores, not to the mention stipends and financial assistance dealt out to its supporters in the south, earned Hezbollah significant acclaim amongst a Shia plurality that was often overlooked in Beirut before the group emerged on the scene.

But that was then. Today, Hezbollah is in its weakest position ever. Israel’s two-month war against the group killed most of its leadership, including Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. Thousands of fighters were killed and southern Lebanon, where most of Hezbollah’s base is located, sustained intense physical damage. Some of the very same supporters who happily accepted Hezbollah’s cash are now blaming the movement for perpetuating a war with Israel that Lebanon had no interest in fighting. As if to underscore just how much Hezbollah has fallen, the Lebanese parliament finally elected a president in January, ending a years-long stalemate, after Hezbollah-affiliated lawmakers stopped obstructing the proceedings.

If Israel’s war in Gaza is the definition of an unwinnable morass, its campaign in Lebanon was short, quick, and decisive. The Israelis managed to destroy much of Hezbollah’s military infrastructure, so much so that Hezbollah’s leadership—or what is left of it—was pressured into signing a ceasefire agreement that mandated the group’s complete evacuation from its stronghold south of the Litani River, approximately 20 miles from Israel’s northern border. As a part of the deal, the Lebanese army re-deployed to the south as Hezbollah fighters moved north, taking their weapons into custody, destroying all weapons-manufacturing facilities, and dismantling “all infrastructure and military positions” previously held by Hezbollah.

Read at The American Conservative

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Only U.S. leverage can stop the horror in Gaza

By Adam Gallagher

July 31, 2025

In the mediaMiddle East, Israel

Has Gaza tested the limits of Donald Trump’s support for Benjamin Netanyahu?

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 30, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What does Trump really want in Gaza?

By Daniel DePetris

July 30, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Why Trump has little interest in delivering a ceasefire in Gaza

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 30, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, Israel, Middle East

There are no more reasons for U.S. presence in Middle East

By William Walldorf

July 28, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

U.S. used about a quarter of its high-end missile interceptors in Israel-Iran war, exposing supply gap

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 28, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved