Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Iran / The tense tussle over Trump’s Iran strategy
Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

June 12, 2025

The tense tussle over Trump’s Iran strategy

By Daniel DePetris

On May 25, President Donald Trump excitedly declared that a nuclear deal with Iran was just around the corner. Three weeks later, the president is noticeably more sanguine about reaching an agreement. “Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago,” Trump commented to Fox News this week. “Much more aggressive.”

The negative vibes extend to the Iranian side. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, still stung by his experience in 2018, when Trump pulled the United States out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, and re-imposed additional sanctions on Iran, is giving lectures that trusting the Americans is a fool’s errand.

All of this is occurring at a time when the Iran hawks in Washington are trying to pressure the White House to ditch the negotiations and throw their support behind Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bid to use military force to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Politico reported this week that conservative talk show host Mark Levin, whose feed on X is generally one long doom-scroll about Iran’s nuclear program, pushed Trump into approving a U.S. military operation against Iran during a private lunch at the White House. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson then pushed back against Levin in a long social media post.

These tensions reflect the fact that Trump is now waging two Iran-related battles simultaneously: one against Iran, and the other against competing camps of advisers. The second battle shouldn’t be cast away as the typical Washington-style palace intrigue, because depending on who wins Trump’s ear, the U.S. will either continue the diplomatic process or sacrifice diplomacy for a war that could very well get out of control.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Trump has left himself only bad options on Iran

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s Diplomacy Has Stalled

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The Silver Lining of Trump’s Disastrous Iran War

By Adam Gallagher

May 19, 2026

Op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Middle East

Donald Trump’s board of irrelevant peace

By Daniel DePetris

May 19, 2026

Op-edMiddle East

America Must Avoid Picking Sides in the Saudi-Emirati Feud

By Alexander Langlois

May 14, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump faces split among retired U.S. commanders over whether to resume Iran strikes

Featuring Daniel Davis

May 13, 2026

Events on Israel-Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel‑Iran

Does the Middle East still matter?

February 6, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024
in-personMiddle East, Counterterrorism, Israel‑Iran

Recalibrating Middle East policy

November 27, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.