Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Iran / The tense tussle over Trump’s Iran strategy
Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

June 12, 2025

The tense tussle over Trump’s Iran strategy

By Daniel DePetris

On May 25, President Donald Trump excitedly declared that a nuclear deal with Iran was just around the corner. Three weeks later, the president is noticeably more sanguine about reaching an agreement. “Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago,” Trump commented to Fox News this week. “Much more aggressive.”

The negative vibes extend to the Iranian side. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, still stung by his experience in 2018, when Trump pulled the United States out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, and re-imposed additional sanctions on Iran, is giving lectures that trusting the Americans is a fool’s errand.

All of this is occurring at a time when the Iran hawks in Washington are trying to pressure the White House to ditch the negotiations and throw their support behind Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bid to use military force to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Politico reported this week that conservative talk show host Mark Levin, whose feed on X is generally one long doom-scroll about Iran’s nuclear program, pushed Trump into approving a U.S. military operation against Iran during a private lunch at the White House. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson then pushed back against Levin in a long social media post.

These tensions reflect the fact that Trump is now waging two Iran-related battles simultaneously: one against Iran, and the other against competing camps of advisers. The second battle shouldn’t be cast away as the typical Washington-style palace intrigue, because depending on who wins Trump’s ear, the U.S. will either continue the diplomatic process or sacrifice diplomacy for a war that could very well get out of control.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

A U.S. war with Iran would be a catastrophe

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 14, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

How should the U.S. respond to Israel’s attack on Iran?

By Daniel DePetris

June 14, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Trump scrambles to claim credit for Israel’s Iran attack he publicly opposed

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 13, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

How close was Iran to a nuclear weapon before Israel’s strike on Tehran?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 13, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Trump talks big on global diplomacy, but his goals are in tatters

Featuring Dan Caldwell

June 13, 2025

Press ReleaseIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

The U.S. should avoid another war in the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 12, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved