Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The Trump administration’s whirlwind week
Grand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

February 19, 2025

The Trump administration’s whirlwind week

By Daniel DePetris

If you have been reading the news over the last week, you might think the United States was on the precipice of throwing Ukraine to the wolves, turning its back on Europe, and reconciling with Russian President Vladimir Putin, perhaps the most hated man in the world. President Donald Trump‘s Feb. 12 phone call to Putin, U.S. Vice President JD Vance‘s scorching speech to the Europeans during the Munich Security Conference, the first in-person meeting between U.S. and Russian officials in years, and the war-of-words between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky all have European politicians, foreign policy experts, and the journalists covering them spooked about a possible sea-change in Europe’s security architecture.

The Trump administration’s early machinations toward Ukraine and Europe have rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. The New Yorker‘s Susan B. Glasser asserted that Trump sold out Ukraine after a single phone call. “It is difficult to put into words what an about-face this is for US support for Ukraine, which for years was built on helping the country defend itself, though not win the war,” The Guardian‘s Andrew Roth wrote. The consensus opinion is best summed up by Peter Baker of The New York Times: “Mr. Trump is in the middle of executing one of the most jaw-dropping pivots in American foreign policy in generations, a 180-degree turn that will force friends and foes to recalibrate in fundamental ways.”

But is the consensus actually accurate? Boisterous headlines aside, some perspective is desperately needed. There are a few points to keep in mind.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s tough talk won’t end war in Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 26, 2025

ExplainerNATO, China, Russia

Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 24, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Zelensky’s power grab threatens Ukraine’s future

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 24, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

How Trump’s 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Vladimir Putin’s conduct causes Donald Trump to have a change of heart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Military analysis

Will Trump’s shift on arming Ukraine help end Russia’s invasion? Experts weigh in

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved