Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Deterrence / U.S. security remains guaranteed by deterrence, time is on our side, and diplomacy should continue
Deterrence, Diplomacy, North Korea

February 28, 2019

U.S. security remains guaranteed by deterrence, time is on our side, and diplomacy should continue

By Benjamin Friedman and Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 28, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—The second Trump-Kim summit in Hanoi ended without a deal. In response, Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman and Military Expert Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statements.

Benjamin H. Friedman:

“The United States can afford a hitch in talks. We have little to lose. With or without a deal, U.S. security vis-à-vis North Korea is already guaranteed by deterrence and North Korea’s relative weakness. That gives the United States considerable leverage and the ability to patiently accept the outcome of this summit and look for future progress in other talks.

“The United States does not to take the lead in negotiating with North Korea. We should let the South Koreans do that; and really they have been the ones creating most of the progress thus far. The United States can agree to relax some sanctions if they find it useful in their talks.

“Denuclearization is an ambitious, if not impossible, goal in the near term. Negotiations with North Korea should continue as part of a process that aims to strengthen peace and allow for normalization of diplomacy and opening of North Korea. Denuclearization and other internal reforms should be seen as eventual goals.”

Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret.:

“Despite this less-than-ideal ending, the fundamentals have not changed: American security rests firmly on our unblinking military deterrent, and we are just as safe today as we were before. The long, difficult process of negotiations should nevertheless continue. Diplomacy—however slow and sometimes unsatisfying—is still in our interest and remains the best path to peace.”

Authors

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Deterrence

ExplainerDeterrence, Grand strategy

Grand strategy: Deterrence

By Christopher McCallion

October 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, China, Deterrence, Iran, Israel, Middle East

How war with Iran would undercut U.S. China strategy

By Adam Gallagher

June 19, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Deterrence, Taiwan

Asia is getting shortchanged as the U.S. keeps its focus elsewhere

By Daniel DePetris

May 27, 2025

In the mediaEurope and Eurasia, Deterrence, Nuclear weapons, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

UK may ‘step into the breach’ and shield EU ally from Russia as US commitment weakens

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 1, 2025

In the mediaYemen, Air power, Deterrence, Iran, Middle East, Military analysis, Naval power

Yemen’s Houthis emerge from Gaza war emboldened, and with more enemies

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

February 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, Americas, Deterrence, Great power competition, Naval power

Canada’s submarine plan

By Andrew Latham

October 2, 2024

Events on Deterrence

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved