Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Ukraine crisis is symptom of broader issues with European security order
Ukraine‑Russia, NATO

January 13, 2022

Ukraine crisis is symptom of broader issues with European security order

By Rajan Menon

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 13, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—This week, the current Ukraine-Russia crisis has been the subject of bilateral U.S.-Russia talks, NATO-Russia talks, and OSCE talks. Defense Priorities Director of Grand Strategy Rajan Menon issued the following statement in response:

“The U.S. and Russia did not negotiate this week—they talked, and they mostly talked past each other.

“On the narrow issue of Ukraine, don’t hold your breath for a resolution. Russia wants a written guarantee that Ukraine will never be admitted to NATO. The U.S. says NATO will not shut the door to Ukraine and that Kyiv has the right to make its own choices. Each side seems to have dug deeper into its position this week.

“Beyond Ukraine, the prospects for agreements between the U.S. and Russia to improve the stability of the European security order—that is, make Europe less prone to crises and war—are somewhat better.

“For example, the two sides could agree to negotiations on some version of the INF Treaty that President Trump exited. Yes, each side—Russia and the U.S.—accused the other of violating the accord in recent years, but negotiations could address those claims and devise solutions.

“The U.S. and Russia could also agree on confidence-building measures, such as advanced warning before major military exercises and limits on the deployment of certain offensive strike weapons. This is not pie-in-the-sky. The U.S. and the Soviet Union reached such agreements during the Cold War.

“Oddly enough, the narrow issue of Ukraine may be the hardest one to resolve.”

Author

Photo of Rajan Menon

Rajan
Menon

Former Non-Resident Senior Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

New US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions Rise

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 22, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine Faces A Growing Risk of Outright Military Collapse If No Deal Struck

By Daniel Davis

May 21, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

The Defining Test: Can Europe’s Rising Right Agree on Ukraine?

By Julian Fisher

May 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump should not demand a ceasefire in Putin call

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s Putin peace deal is doomed

By Daniel DePetris

May 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Don’t Blame Trump If He Gives Up on Russia-Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 17, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved