Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Iran / President Trump should not attack Iran
Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

June 17, 2025

President Trump should not attack Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 17, 2025
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Rosemary Kelanic, Director of the Middle East Program at Defense Priorities, issued the following statement in response to heightened concerns that the U.S. is considering striking Iran.

“President Trump should not attack Iran. The U.S. military is highly capable, but strikes to destroy Iran’s nuclear program would be neither quick nor easy. And they would harm, rather than help, diplomatic efforts to remove the risks Iran will someday acquire a nuclear weapon, or result in regime change or destruction that creates a failed state.

“Iran’s known nuclear sites are buried deep beneath mountains that the strongest U.S. bunker busters would struggle to destroy. Even if airstrikes damage critical infrastructure, the nuclear centrifuges and enriched uranium stockpiles may survive, leaving critical parts of the program intact—any strikes would encourage Iran to race to a bomb.

“The only way to eliminate Iran’s nuclear sites with certainty is to put boots on the ground. And that means regime change. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants the U.S. to join Israel’s war with Iran, not only to remove nuclear weapons, but also to remove the regime in Tehran. That would be a bloody, protracted fiasco.

“U.S. strikes on Iran would undermine non-proliferation goals, and Congress has not approved any war on Iran—launching one would thwart the will of the American people, who oppose another costly Middle East war.

“We need a political solution, not war. Diplomacy can still work—it’s the only path to avoid further calamity.”

See here for more analysis on the Israel-Iran conflict.

A U.S. War With Iran Would Be a Catastrophe (New York Times)

Author

Rosemary
Kelanic

Director, Middle East Program

Defense Priorities

More on Israel-Iran

op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria

Trump’s Middle East policy is teetering on overextension

By William Walldorf

January 29, 2026

In the mediaIran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Middle East, U.S.‑Iran

Iran’s nuclear reset shows airstrikes may not end ambitions

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

December 29, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons, U.S.‑Iran

Iran escalates nuclear stand off

By Daniel DePetris

November 22, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, U.S.‑Iran

Did decisive U.S. action restore deterrence—or has Washington simply been lucky?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

October 16, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

U.S. used about a quarter of its high-end missile interceptors in Israel-Iran war, exposing supply gap

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 28, 2025

Events on Israel-Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel‑Iran

Does the Middle East still matter?

February 6, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024
in-personMiddle East, Counterterrorism, Israel‑Iran

Recalibrating Middle East policy

November 27, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved