Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / North Korea / North Korea’s destruction of the liaison office is an act of desperation
North Korea, Diplomacy

June 16, 2020

North Korea’s destruction of the liaison office is an act of desperation

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 16, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The New York Times reported that North Korea blew up a building housing a liaison office where DPRK and ROK officials had been engaging in person-to-person diplomacy since 2018. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“North Korea has a long history of saber rattling to extract concessions, and destroying the North-South liaison office conforms to that pattern. Pyongyang’s latest move is not a rejection of diplomacy with the U.S. and South Korea—the only way the DPRK can end its longstanding political isolation and international sanctions against it—but rather an expression of frustration at the lack of progress in negotiations.

“Despite deteriorating relations between Pyongyang and Washington, the U.S. retains an overwhelming military advantage that can deter any unprovoked North Korean attack. The DPRK has always prioritized regime survival and is well aware that the balance of power strongly favors the U.S. and its allies. While the regime will continue to carry out acts of provocative symbolism as it deems expedient, it will not provoke a conflict it is sure to lose.

“Continued diplomatic engagement with the DPRK can yield results, but current U.S. policy—to seek complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantlement of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program before granting Pyongyang any relief—is a nonstarter for North Korea, whose nuclear weapons guarantee its survival. A more incremental negotiating approach could, however, secure nuclear freezes, rollbacks, and even relative peace on the Korean peninsula. To facilitate this process, the U.S. should grant Seoul a freer hand to pursue reconciliation with its northern neighbor.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina, Asia, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Hegseth is taking the Army on another dead end ride to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 20, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

It’s Time for Trump and Xi to Meet

By Lyle Goldstein

May 17, 2025

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edAsia, Air power, Nuclear weapons

Will India or Pakistan resort to the nuclear option?

By Rajan Menon

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

Events on North Korea

See All Events
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018
in-personGrand strategy, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Managing nuclear proliferation crises

October 30, 2017

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved