Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / New START extension would aid strategic stability
Grand strategy, Russia

January 21, 2021

New START extension would aid strategic stability

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 21, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Washington Post reported the Biden administration will seek a five-year extension of the New START nuclear arms control treaty with Russia. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“Extending the New START accord with Russia for five years is a victory for common sense. Extension preserves the last remaining strategic stability accord between the world’s two largest nuclear powers.

“No treaty is perfect, but keeping New START is almost a no-brainer. The deal keeps Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal in a box and provides the U.S. with significant access to Russia’s nuclear weapons program. Usefully, it also reduces pressure to increase U.S. nuclear weapons spending. While the treaty won’t fix U.S.-Russia relations, it could provide a basis for diplomatic progress in other areas, like tactical nuclear weapons and missile deployments.

“U.S.-Russia Competition does not preclude cooperation on mutual security objectives. Maintaining strategic stability and open, clear communication is in the U.S. national security interest.

“The Trump administration’s position of holding a New START extension hostage to a more comprehensive trilateral agreement with Russia and China was dead on arrival. China, with an arsenal a fraction of the size of the U.S. and Russia, was never interested in such an arrangement. Russia was highly unlikely to negotiate a stronger agreement without the U.S. putting missile defense systems on the table. Keeping New START avoids these pitfalls and gives the U.S. and Russia more time to explore other possibilities.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved