Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Will Trump push back on Putin’s ceasefire demands?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

March 14, 2025

Will Trump push back on Putin’s ceasefire demands?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

Russian President Vladimir Putin has stopped short of rejecting the U.S.-proposed unconditional 30-day ceasefire, but neither has he accepted it. “The idea itself is correct […] but there are issues to discuss,” he said yesterday.

Putin’s rhetorical sidestep is an unsurprising but nonetheless important reminder that achieving a lasting peace in Ukraine will not be easy. U.S. President Donald Trump still hopes for a quick settlement, telling reporters yesterday that “we have to get [the war] over with fast”. The sentiment is admirable, but Trump and his advisors should not let their ambition for a deal—or their desire for speed—come before American interests, even if this means walking away.

While Trump’s Oval Office blow-up with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made clear the divergence between U.S. and Ukrainian interests, Putin’s refusal to immediately accept the 30-day ceasefire shows that America and Russia do not share a common interest either. Winning on the battlefield as Ukraine barely hangs on, Putin has no incentive to agree to a ceasefire right now, especially a temporary one that would allow Ukraine to rest and regroup. It’s true that Russia’s army would also benefit from a pause in fighting, but Ukraine is considerably more desperate. Putin’s best move is to press on Kyiv’s weaknesses, maximising his leverage before negotiating.

Trump might try to force Putin to the bargaining table, either by imposing sanctions—as he threatened in January—or stepping up military aid to Ukraine. Yet he’s likely to find this approach much less successful with Russia than it was with Ukraine. Putin has already survived three years of punishing economic and financial sanctions, and is not dependent on the United States to keep his war machine running.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia Wins the War on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 14, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Iran war has given Putin leverage over Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.