Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Nuclear weapons / Welcome to a Global Nuclear Arms Dilemma
Nuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

February 6, 2026

Welcome to a Global Nuclear Arms Dilemma

By Daniel DePetris

This week, history was made. For the first time in nearly a half-century, the United States and Russia, the world’s two biggest nuclear weapons powers, don’t have any restraints on their arsenals.

The New START Treaty, the 2010 accord that restricted the U.S. and Russia’s number of deployed nuclear-capable missiles and launchers, expired on Thursday. As expected, proponents of that agreement spent the last several days urging the powers that be in both capitals to extend its provisions by at least another year. Former president Barack Obama, who negotiated and signed the deal, has warned that New START’s demise ”would pointlessly wipe out decades of diplomacy, and could spark another arms race that makes the world less safe.” Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev claimed that the club of nuclear-armed states will likely grow with the treaty’s demise.

President Donald Trump, however, hasn’t demonstrated much concern over this development—a somewhat odd response given that he’s expounded about the dangers of nuclear proliferation in the past. “If it expires, it expires,” Trump told the New York Times in early January when asked about New START. “We’ll do a better agreement.” Of course, this is what he said when he pulled the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal during his first term. Eight years later, a new, better nuclear agreement with Tehran remains elusive (although U.S. and Iranian officials are expected to meet in Oman on Friday).

On the whole, New START has been dead on the vine for a while. Although the U.S. and Russia kept to the numerical limits spelled out in the treaty, the transparency, verification and reporting protocols that were designed to ensure both sides had a complete understanding of one another’s nuclear stockpiles became inoperable after Putin withdrew from them in February 2023. Inspection visits between Washington and Moscow never recuperated after the COVID pandemic, and information exchanges have stalled.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia, US‑Israel‑Iran

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Russia

Russia warns of response to any U.S. weapons deployment in Greenland

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

February 5, 2026

Events on Nuclear weapons

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualChina, Nuclear weapons

Raising the minimum: explaining China’s nuclear buildup

May 19, 2022
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.