Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Trump’s submarine threat will prolong war in Ukraine
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

August 3, 2025

Trump’s submarine threat will prolong war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

President Donald Trump’s reliance on social media for policymaking is well known, but the use of his Truth Social platform to announce an apparent change in America’s nuclear posture was a first even for him. On Friday, responding to threats from Russia’s former President Dmitri Medvedev, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to be “positioned in the appropriate regions”. He added: ‘Just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that’”.

Trump may hope that this decision increases his leverage with Moscow as his administration continues to press for peace in Ukraine. But his threat is ultimately unlikely to achieve either objective. Instead, it amounts to a risky provocation that works against efforts to end the war in Ukraine, makes America less secure, and leaves Trump looking weak rather than strong.

Trump’s Truth Social post left unanswered questions—which submarines was he referring to, and what moves did he supposedly order? In reality, there were likely few, if any, changes to US nuclear readiness or undersea deployments. America has a fleet of 14 nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, of which four or five are on “hard alert” at all times. These don’t need to be relocated to maintain strike readiness. They can hit targets from thousands of miles away and though their locations are classified, it is a safe assumption that several are already prepared to hit Russia if ordered to do so.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia Wins the War on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 14, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Iran war has given Putin leverage over Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.