Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Trump’s right to take troops out of Germany. Now see where they go.
NATO, Europe and Eurasia

May 6, 2026

Trump’s right to take troops out of Germany. Now see where they go.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

For weeks, President Donald Trump has warned that there would be consequences for NATO allies who did not provide enough support to the U.S. war in Iran. On Friday, the Pentagon made this threat a reality, announcing that the United States would remove 5,000 soldiers from Germany and cancel the planned deployment of a battalion-sized unit scheduled to bring U.S. long-range missiles to Europe later this year.

The reaction was predictably overwrought. While Germany’s defense minister insisted that the move was expected and manageable, Russia hawks in Washington immediately criticized the decision as one that would undermine deterrence and weaken U.S. national security. Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had to spend the weekend defending himself against accusations that the U.S. withdrawal was his fault, a reaction to his earlier criticism of the U.S. military’s failure in the Middle East.

Everyone needs to take a deep breath. The planned changes in force posture are notable but will have very limited effects on European deterrence. While it is reasonable to be concerned about the haste with which the decision was made, the announced withdrawal is clearly aligned with the Trump administration’s stated strategic goals as well as Europe’s intention to take responsibility for its own defense. Ultimately, a smaller U.S. military footprint can advance both U.S. and European security interests.

Much of the fallout in Washington has been focused on the planned removal of a brigade combat team (BCT) from Germany, a drawdown that the Pentagon says may happen in six to 12 months and would result in the forces leaving Europe, though their future location is to be determined.

Read at Responsible Statecraft

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

ExplainerBurden sharing, Basing and force posture, Europe and Eurasia

Stop bargaining with Europe, start leaving

By Benjamin Friedman and Moritz Graefrath

May 27, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.