Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / The US-ROK alliance will change under Lee Jae-myung
Asia

June 4, 2025

The US-ROK alliance will change under Lee Jae-myung

By Daniel DePetris

The June 3 victory of Democratic Party of Korea (DP) presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung provides South Korea with an opportunity to turn the page on six months of political dysfunction. At its core, the election was a referendum on former President Yoon Suk Yeol as well as the People Power Party (PPP), a segment of which tried to justify Yoon’s failed attempt at martial law last December. While foreign policy issues played only a small role during the snap election, the emergence of a new South Korean government has the potential to impact the U.S.-South Korea alliance in a number of ways. Although the alliance will certainly remain intact, Washington and Seoul won’t be as in-synch as they were during Yoon’s tenure.

Yoon was an increasingly unpopular politician in the eyes of the South Korean public even before he sought to upend South Korea’s constitutional order. In April 2024, the PPP experienced a humbling defeat in legislative elections, which handed the opposition DP control of the National Assembly and effectively turned Yoon into a lame-duck. In September 2024, three months before his martial law bid, Yoon’s public approval rating was at 20%, the lowest of his presidency.

Yoon’s perception in Washington, though, was far different. The Biden administration frequently described the South Korean president as a valuable ally lauded for his cooperation on regional security matters, deterrence on the Korean Peninsula and, ironically, democratic bona-fides. In March 2024, South Korea hosted the third U.S.-organized Summit for Democracy, where Yoon was showered with praise for leading a nation that only a few decades ago was still in the throes of a military-led dictatorship. The general perception in U.S. policy circles was that the Yoon administration was a force-multiplier for what the United States sought to accomplish in the region and a partner that could be relied upon to keep U.S. preferences front-of-mind.

Read at Pacific Forum

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina, Asia

China is the bright spot in Trump’s foreign policy

By Lyle Goldstein

February 12, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Nuclear weapons

A U.S.-Russia nuclear disarmament treaty may benefit U.S.-China relations

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 4, 2026

op-edAsia

Why the U.S. and South Korea will not jointly construct nuclear submarines

By Lyle Goldstein

January 27, 2026

China, Asia

Fate of China’s top general more likely to do with power struggle than corruption

By Lyle Goldstein

January 26, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, China, Greenland, Russia, Western Hemisphere

Russian and Chinese threats to Greenland and the new Arctic sea routes are low

By Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

China’s retro submarine design speeds up challenge to U.S. undersea dominance

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualAsia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Asia Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved