Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / South Korea’s new president tries to shake up the Korean Peninsula
Asia

July 29, 2025

South Korea’s new president tries to shake up the Korean Peninsula

By Daniel DePetris

As the world rightly remains focused on the bloody battlefields of Ukraine and the humanitarian abomination that is Gaza, South Korea’s new president is trying to shake up the status quo on the Korean Peninsula, one of the most militarized regions on the planet. Whether he succeeds will depend on North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s willingness to cooperate and the Donald Trump administration’s support of the endeavor.

Lee Jae Myung, a former factory worker and opposition politician elected in June, came into office promising big things. His campaign, which came at a time when recently impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol was facing charges of instigating a coup, focused on getting South Korea back in order. The country, one of Asia’s leading democracies, is still recuperating from months of political turmoil and constitutional crisis after a short-lived usurpation of power by Yoon fizzled courtesy of South Korean troops who held their fire and civilians who came out to protest.

Lee ran a campaign centered primarily on competence with a simple but compelling message: He’ll fix what his predecessor broke. This included changes to South Korea’s foreign policy as well, which Lee argued was far too hawkish and ideological under Yoon. He wasn’t wrong; Yoon’s presidency, for instance, was a disaster for inter-Korean relations. The disgraced president’s North Korea policy leaned on the stick to the total exclusion of the carrot, with communication channels between South and North Korean officials falling apart and the one big security agreement the two adversaries signed in 2018 dying on the table. North Korea’s Kim shares the blame too, but there’s no question that Yoon’s hard-line policies pushed Pyongyang into a corner.

Bringing stability back to the Korean Peninsula is a tall order for any South Korean president sitting in the Blue House. Yet for Lee, it’s a necessity if the goal is to prevent a further degradation of the situation.

Read at Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edAsia

The promise and pitfalls of Japan’s new ‘Iron Lady’

By Lyle Goldstein

November 19, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

China’s new aircraft supercarrier challenges U.S. dominance in Pacific

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

November 14, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

China’s flashy aircraft carriers are no threat to U.S. national security

By Lyle Goldstein

November 5, 2025

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Trump’s ‘G2’ revival sparks anxiety in Washington and Asia

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

November 5, 2025

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Losing a Taiwan War? with Lyle Goldstein

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

November 4, 2025

op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Skirting Taiwan will not spare Trump and Xi a future crisis

By Lyle Goldstein

October 31, 2025

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved