Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Enough with “do something” foreign policy
Middle East, Grand strategy

February 21, 2024

Enough with “do something” foreign policy

By Anthony Constantini

The killing of American troops stationed in Jordan by Iranian proxies has understandably unleashed much umbrage across the U.S. There have been bipartisan calls for some sort of response, and interventionists like John Bolton have argued for strikes in Iran itself. After considering their options, the Biden administration responded with strikes on those proxies in what some experts said “could begin to send a deterrent message.” As of now, this imagined “deterrent” has failed, as insurgent attacks have not ceased.

But after 20 years, “could” simply does not cut it. Instead of attacking with counterproductive strikes which will waste money, more lives, and will not have their intended effect, the Biden administration should heavily draw down troops in the Middle East.

Critics will say this is cutting and running. But there is wisdom in adjusting our force posture to be in line with America’s actual interests. In 1983, 241 American troops were killed by terrorists who detonated bombs in their barracks in Beirut. President Ronald Reagan responded with pinprick strikes but ultimately just pulled the remaining troops out entirely. Why? Because we did not need to be there, just like we do not need to be in Tower 22, the base on the Jordan-Syria border where troops were killed recently.

But let’s, for a moment, agree with those who say we must react, or, as the interventionists always like to say, “Do something.” What should we do? The most extreme option would have been to declare war on Iran. What would be the goal of a war? Neoconservatives have long argued for Iranian regime change, dating back to the revolution in 1979. And while it is indeed an evil regime, would the outcome of war be successful regime change? We have tried this twice in recent decades. The first attempt met spectacular failure in Afghanistan and the second, Iraq, is teetering and has been totally co-opted by Iran’s government as it is. Plus, a war on Iran would create thousands of casualties among American troops and far more among their civilian population. And what then? Would we nation-build, as we failed to do in Afghanistan? Would we just blow it up and leave, hoping a group like ISIS doesn’t emerge?

Read at RealClearWorld

Author

Photo of Anthony Constantini

Anthony
Constantini

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Thousands turn out in Melbourne to stand in solidarity with protests that have broken out in Iran following the death of 22-year old Mahsa Amini at the hands of the country’s brutal dictatorship and its ‘morality’ police.
Iran

Should the U.S. do anything about Iran’s protests?

By Rosemary Kelanic

January 19, 2026

op-edMiddle East

The Saudi-UAE schism could make Trump’s job even harder

By Daniel DePetris

January 2, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

The foreign policy moves Donald Trump got right this year

By Daniel DePetris

December 30, 2025

In the mediaIran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Iran’s nuclear reset shows airstrikes may not end ambitions

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

December 29, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Africa, Middle East

Trump wants a Nobel prize. But his record as a peacemaker is mixed at best.

By Daniel DePetris

December 28, 2025

In the mediaSyria, Counterterrorism, Middle East

After strike on American troops, what’s next for the U.S. in Syria?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

December 18, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved