Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Can Joe Biden really strike a deal between Israel and Saudi Arabia?
Grand strategy, Middle East

April 22, 2024

Can Joe Biden really strike a deal between Israel and Saudi Arabia?

By Daniel DePetris

Very rarely do American presidents get policy wins in the Middle East. The region hasn’t been kind to the United States over the last thirty years. The signing of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty during the Jimmy Carter years and the U.S.-led military campaign against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq during the 1991 Gulf War are two exceptions to the rule. Everything else has been a failure of degree. Others, like the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the Trump administration’s arbitrary withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear deal in 2018, were self-inflicted wounds that made the region bloodier and more difficult to manage.

True to tradition, the Biden administration doesn’t have much foreign policy success in the Middle East either. Part of this is because president Biden sought to talk down the region in U.S. grand strategy, a worthy goal given the limited U.S. interests there. But another part is the sheer difficulty of achieving a major diplomatic success in this area of the world. Whenever the U.S. tries to get one going, whether it was the Oslo Process during the 1990s or the back-channel diplomacy to end Yemen’s decade-long civil war in the 2020s, the efforts have usually stalled.

Biden, however, has been spending the last year trying to accomplish something remarkable: establishing normal diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel, a feat that would surpass the Trump administration’s Abraham Accords in terms of historical significance. The White House has expended a ton of diplomatic capital in pursuit of it and is so desperate for a win that it’s prepared to offer Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman two big U.S. concessions along the way: a stronger U.S. defense commitment to Saudi Arabia and assistance with Riyadh’s nuclear energy program.

Yet October 7 changed the game, not only due to the depravity of Hamas’s assault and Israel’s still unfolding, six-month offensive in Gaza but also because Saudi Arabia is now demanding far more on the Palestinian file today than they did last year. An Israel-Saudi normalisation agreement sounds simple in theory: the two countries, who have already worked together under the table for years, would sign a document, open up their embassies and exchange their ambassadors. But that would be an overly simplistic interpretation of how this entire process would work. In reality, an Israel-Saudi deal is really an Israel-Saudi-U.S.-Palestinian deal that requires concessions from everybody. It’s in essence a complicated jigsaw puzzle where all the pieces have to fit perfectly into place.

Read at The Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Press ReleaseSyria, Middle East

Drawdown from Syria a success worth scaling

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump’s global gunboat diplomacy leaves the U.S. overstretched

By Alexander Langlois

February 3, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Ignore the Hawks. Attacking Iran comes with huge risks

By Peter Harris

February 1, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved