Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / By winging it in Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu is taking a big risk
Israel‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

August 12, 2025

By winging it in Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu is taking a big risk

By Daniel DePetris

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving premier, is no stranger to making tough decisions. But the decision he made last week to expand Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, to the vocal opposition of some of the Israeli military’s most senior officers, was perhaps his most controversial one to date.
After intense debate in the security cabinet, Netanyahu ordered the Israel Defense Forces to accelerate ground operations in the roughly 25% of Gaza outside of Israel’s control. According to the plan, the IDF will move into Gaza City and the camps in central Gaza, push the roughly 1 million Palestinians who reside there farther south and root out the remaining Hamas units operating in the area.
The operation seems straightforward from a military standpoint: get the civilians out, isolate the hardened fighters and kill them. But for many in the IDF, including chief of staff Gen. Eyal Zamir, Netanyahu’s plan runs the risk of plunging Israeli troops into an occupation of the Palestinian enclave that Netanyahu’s predecessors came to regret.
Netanyahu remains defiant. “Given Hamas’ refusal to lay down its arms, Israel has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas,” he told foreign journalists over the weekend. He has gone to great pains to stress that Israel won’t keep Gaza indefinitely; the goal is simply to free Gaza of Hamas. The problem is that Netanyahu often seems like he’s winging it, is often unsure of the next steps and arrogantly refuses to acknowledge the consequences of his own actions.
This latest decision is no different.

Read at Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Mutual suspicion is too great for the ceasefire to hold

By Daniel DePetris

April 9, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Trump’s ceasefire still leaves the U.S. and Iran mired in quandary

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 8, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Why Trump stepped back from the brink

By Daniel DePetris

April 8, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s Ceasefire Leaves Unanswered Questions About What Was Gained

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 8, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Iran Still Controls Strait of Hormuz During Ceasefire

Featuring Daniel Davis

April 7, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s two-week delay is a start. But there’s a big obstacle to a lasting ceasefire.

By Daniel DePetris

April 7, 2026

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.